College papers academic writing service


The role of leaders in developing nepal

All these organizations have an impressive track record of promoting inter-religious dialogue and contributing to peace-building and reconciliation in Nepal and elsewhere in the world. Fire can be used to light a candle in darkness and to cook meals to feed the hungry.

In a world so full of religious intolerance and extremism, often stoked by communal, sectarian and political demagogues, let us not assume that religion is automatically a force for the good. From the vast and diverse reservoir of religious scriptures, people of goodwill and wisdom need to help distill and disseminate those religious teachings that both reflect the original noble intentions of all religions and that the role of leaders in developing nepal likely to foster the kind of progressive transformation of society that we all aspire to.

All religions of the world, at their core, teach love, peace, solidarity and compassion as their primary teachings. They seek to foster responsibility enabling children and young people to live with hope. They inspire the elderly to forsake worldly temptations and live a virtuous life. And yet, we know that in the name of religion, many wrongs are committed, injustice justified, indifference to the plight of women and children accepted, harmful traditional practices perpetuated, and intolerance and even hatred inculcated in the minds and hearts of the believers.

Learned religious scholars and leaders tell us that it is not religion but superstition in the name of religion that is responsible for these negative practices. We are told that certain harmful and discriminatory cultural practices that we find in all societies, are the product of unique circumstances in the history of those societies that may have had a good rationale at some point but are wrongly applied today. By definition, most religious teachings are of divine origin, of eternal relevance and of timeless value.

Yet, because most religions have been around for thousands of years, and have evolved in many different social and cultural settings, it is understandable that many local practices have emerged that maybe at variance with the original teachings found in the scriptures.

  1. As we head for new elections, this is likely to be a real nuisance for ordinary people.
  2. And all of us, people faith and goodwill, seeking social justice, political freedoms and economic progress must reject a culture of violence as an acceptable means for achieving any worthy goals.
  3. It seems to me, that we the religious leaders have a special responsibility to educate and dissuade the local priests from ever participating in child marriage.
  4. And all of us, people faith and goodwill, seeking social justice, political freedoms and economic progress must reject a culture of violence as an acceptable means for achieving any worthy goals. The ordinary people, on the other hand, said that the mission of their church and priests was to help people understand and fight against poverty, inequality and oppression.
  5. Please do not say or imply. We are already seeing how Teach For Nepal, just four years old, is changing mindsets among students, fellows our participant teachers and community members about how change happens and inspiring a renewed sense of possibility.

We find many contradictions in religious beliefs and teachings. It is not uncommon to find the same holy book, and even the same prophet, preaching different values at different times and in different contexts. Ancient Hindu holy books are full of such contradictory remarks. Why does a woman need independence? Or, take the infamous caste system.

Many enlightened Hindu theologians argue that in the original and authentic Hinduism, the caste-system was not supposed to be hereditary, or hierarchical, or discriminatory, but just a division of labour. Yet, the caste system has degenerated into one of the most entrenched, hierarchical and discriminatory systems ever devised by mankind.

I can tell you that one can find such contradictions in all religions — bar none — if not in scriptures, certainly in practice. That is why we have had so many holy wars, jihads and crusades in the name of religion. The origins of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Irish civil war, the Shia-Sunni conflicts in the Middle-east today, and even the Second World War can be traced to religious intolerance.

We think that Buddhism is among the most peaceful and tolerant religions. Yet, we have seen recently the sad events in Burma and Sri Lanka where Buddhist the role of leaders in developing nepal were involved in inciting or condoning violence.

That is why it is important not just to study what the holy scriptures and great prophets say, but how their message is understood and conveyed by your local neighbourhood priests or these days, by your modern televangelists preachers. For most ordinary people, what matters, and guides their daily life, is not what the holy scriptures say as understood by learned scholars, but what your neighbourhood folk priest tells you every day.

If your local priest agrees to perform religious rites to marry off your 12 year-old daughter to a man twice her age, that is the accepted religion in practice. If your local priest encourages or condones the giving and receiving of dowry, that becomes a religiously sanctioned practice. If your local priest tells you that the way you have been practicing your religion is the only correct way, and the practitioners of all other faiths and sects are pagans and infidels, that becomes your accepted religious norm.

So, part of our difficult job at this symposium is to strategize how best we can invoke the most enlightened teachings in all of our religions to the role of leaders in developing nepal to building peace and prosperity in this country — Nepal.

Since we are here representing many religions and denominations, I have one request to all of us. Please do not say or imply: It is very easy and tempting to be self-righteous, and point fingers at others. There is an old saying that it takes a diamond to cut diamond. So, the best way to remedy some of the evils that are perpetrated in the name of religion, is to invoke the enlightened elements of the same religion.

In the spirit of constructive partnership, and inter-faith collaboration, we can all help each other. But I would caution against any tendency by followers of any one religion to say or imply that to overcome some social problems people need to change their religion. Nepal is now a secular state, and there is full freedom of religion.

People are free to voluntarily choose any religion according to their conscience and conviction. I am a strong supporter of secularism in the sense of separation of state and religion.

But secularism should not be misunderstood as a license for conversion. It is especially unethical to use any financial or material temptations to entice people to change their religion.

Nor should there be any discriminatory practices among followers of different religions when faith-based NGOs provide basic social services in various communities. I consider myself an open-minded agnostic, and no longer a follower of any one particular religion, but an admirer of many.

  1. And yet, we know that in the name of religion, many wrongs are committed, injustice justified, indifference to the plight of women and children accepted, harmful traditional practices perpetuated, and intolerance and even hatred inculcated in the minds and hearts of the believers. From the vast and diverse reservoir of religious scriptures, people of goodwill and wisdom need to help distill and disseminate those religious teachings that both reflect the original noble intentions of all religions and that are likely to foster the kind of progressive transformation of society that we all aspire to.
  2. I am deeply convinced that there is enormous potential for harnessing the power of religion for the good of humanity in all countries, including Nepal. But that alone will not solve the problem in a country where the rule of law is very weak.
  3. The training will cover the following major topics.

I am deeply convinced that there is enormous potential for harnessing the power of religion for the good of humanity in all countries, including Nepal. In my work with UNICEF for the well-being of children, some of our greatest achievements were the result of our partnership with faith-based organizations. In the 1980s, we were able to raise child immunization rates from 20 percent to 80 percent in many countries of Latin America, thanks to a very productive partnership with the huge network of Catholic Church which reached many communities where the normal government health services could not reach.

We collaborated with the Grand-sheikh of Al Azhar in Egypt to get him to issue a fatwa that said female genital mutilation was not a sanctioned or required practice in Islam. Another fatwa he issued helped us resume polio eradication activities in Nigeria which had been disrupted by local Muslim imams. The Ramakrishna Mission in India runs a huge network of schools and colleges providing quality education to children from deprived communities, including children with disabilities.

It contains specific modules teaching children who live in multi-faith, multi-cultural societies about the importance of solidarity for combating poverty, promoting human rights, protecting the the role of leaders in developing nepal, and collaborating for a just and peaceful world. And I serve as an International Trustee of Religions for Peace, perhaps the largest global inter-faith organization comprising senior religious leaders of all major faiths of the world.

The work we do to promote peace through inter-faith dialogue in many countries in conflict helps establish or re-establish inter-religious harmony — a very important ingredient of peace-building in many countries. Based on these and many other experiences, I am convinced that in Nepal too religious organizations and leaders can do much to promote peace and development.

Indeed, I see quite a few religious leaders here in the audience who have tried to do precisely that during the period of our intense conflict and afterwards, with some limited success.

Advice from many well-wishers — from the Secretary-General of the United Nations to Jimmy Carter, from the Norwegian Ministers to respected Nepalese civil society stalwarts — have generally fallen on deaf ears.

So let us not waste our time advocating to them. And I would also say let us not waste our time offering unsolicited advice on matters concerning the drafting of the Constitution or the election process. Part of the reason for it is that I doubt there would be a clear consensus on these issues even among various religious leaders of Nepal.

However, I believe there is considerable scope for religious leaders to have positive impact at community level peace-building and social change. One issue on which there is great potential for religious leaders is to campaign against violence. Thankfully, the armed civil conflict has ended in Nepal, but durable peace has not dawned yet.

This holy land gave birth to Lord Gautam Buddha, the Prince of Peace, who renounced his Kingdom to spread the message of peace to the whole world. But today this country is experiencing an orgy of violence, lawlessness, impunity and insecurity.

Whether it is to settle minor local disputes, or partisan issues blown out of proportion, or even genuine grievances that require thoughtful debate, the first and instinctive recourse of our political party-affiliated trade unions is often to call for Nepal bandh or regional bandhs — a general strike involving shut-down of public transport, closure of schools, disrupting public services, instilling a sense of fear, and inconveniencing innocent people, as we experienced yesterday, disrupting our symposium.

LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT TRAINING

As we head for new elections, this is likely to be a real nuisance for ordinary people. In a democracy, people have the right to protest, engage in collective bargaining, and press their demands peacefully.

If religious leaders of Nepal were to unite and systematically oppose any such generalized bandhs that prevent children from going to school, patients from going to hospitals, innocent passengers from traveling in public transport, labourers from earning a living, shop-keepers from opening their stores and depriving ordinary citizens from buying and selling essential commodities — I am sure there would be a wave of public support and praise for such initiative.

We know most such bandhs have no public support at all, but people feel intimidated even by small bands of hooligans and passively comply with their fiat. There has been a move in this country to declare schools, health centres and places of worship as zones of peace. But we have not seen religious leaders showing any organized solidarity for such zones of peace proposals. Let me suggest that one resolution coming out of this symposium should be that religious leaders of all faith in this country will actively but peacefully oppose any and all calls for generalized Nepal bandh the role of leaders in developing nepal who calls such bandh.

As religious leaders, we must fight to end the deep-rooted structural violence in our society, and show solidarity with whoever leads such efforts. But that does not justify intimidation, extortion and indiscriminate physical violence or threat of violence, because two wrongs do not make a right.

A semblance of justice achieved through unjust means, is not real justice but only a temporary revenge. Human history shows us that justice pursued through violent means, rarely helps build a just and peaceful society. On the contrary, it often sows the seeds of hatred, distrust and revenge afterwards. And all of us, people faith and goodwill, seeking social justice, political freedoms and economic progress must reject a culture of violence as an acceptable means for achieving any worthy goals.

Introduction

Most importantly, we must inculcate in the minds and hearts of our children and youth the values of non-violence and peaceful pursuit of all worthy goals. At the United Nations, there is a common saying that peace and development are two sides of the same coin.

To sustain peace, we must help liberate people from the tyranny of poverty and powerlessness. The importance of this message was conveyed to me in a very poignant manner by a respected religious leader in Haiti. There I befriended an enlightened archbishop of Cap Haitien, Monseigneur Francois Gayot, who once told me that he had commissioned an opinion poll asking an identical question to both his parish priests and to the general public.

The question was this: The answers could not have been more contrasting. The priests responded that the main mission of the Church was to inspire and provide religious guidance to the parishioners and to bring them the word of God.

Role of Religion in Peace-building and Development in Nepal

The ordinary people, on the other hand, said that the mission of their church and priests was to help people understand and fight against poverty, inequality and oppression. As we can see, all too often the priests and the people look at the world, and the role of religion, in very different ways.

Local Communities Must Take the Lead in Global Change

In addition to fostering peace and development, a third area I would recommend for religious leaders in Nepal to focus on, would be to tackle those problems that religions themselves have created or condoned, or which many ordinary people mistakenly think are sanctioned by their religion.

I mentioned the example of child marriage. Many parents think that it is for the good of their own child. After all, no parent wants to harm their own child knowingly.

Governments can pass laws and impose penalties against parents who engage in child marriage. But that alone will not solve the role of leaders in developing nepal problem in a country where the rule of law is very weak. It is usually the local priest who officiates the wedding.

It seems to me, that we the religious leaders have a special responsibility to educate and dissuade the local priests from ever participating in child marriage. It is not enough that we say in seminars in Kathmandu that our religion does not justify child marriage. May I suggest that all religious leaders represented here, especially from the Hindu and Muslim communities, and their organizations and networks, initiate a campaign against child marriage, institute a monitoring system to ensure this practice is really discouraged and discontinued within the next two to three years?

I see here some representatives of the donor community who, I know, want to see progress in this area.