College papers academic writing service


The united states jury system in the story 12 angry men by reginald rose

Jeff Saporito October 20, 2015 What is justice? Is the American legal system set up to encourage it?

  • As the narrative progresses and Juror 8 Henry Fonda , the original lone vote for a not guilty verdict, presents information that dissolves testimony made in the courtroom, the individual definitions of justice start to appear;
  • A verdict is never shown to be rendered on the accused;
  • While such thinking is still a problem today, it was blatantly rampant in the court system at the time;
  • The men and the situation are to represent anywhere in America, making the film a poignant social commentary on the country at large.

Will there always be flaws in any system thanks to the prejudices of the people it represents? How does it feel to be one standing against many? It is also a film born in tandem with the origins of the civil rights movement, after the pandemonium of McCarthyism, in a time shadowed by the fear of nuclear war.

Above all, the film is about a worldview.

12 angry men Essay Examples

Screenwriter Reginald Rose saw American society as crumbling amongst itself, and 12 Angry Men stands as a warning to Americans: That anonymity makes the film applicable to anyone in America.

The men and the situation are to represent anywhere in America, making the film a poignant social commentary on the country at large.

Expert Answers

Each character in the film wants justice for the crime. As the narrative progresses and Juror 8 Henry Fondathe original lone vote for a not guilty verdict, presents information that dissolves testimony made in the courtroom, the individual definitions of justice start to appear.

  • Clearly, it is because of the willingness of No;
  • You know, they get drunk, and bang, someone's lying in the gutter;
  • The film is also a work of post-McCarthyism, and the jurors' instincts to unfairly convict recalls the very recent history of the McCarthy era;
  • Furthermore, he is accustomed to imposing his views on others.

The passions and failings of each man are presented distinctly, and a sense of every character as an individual variation on the emblem of the American man takes form. Another wants to convict so he can get out of the courthouse and go see a Yankees game. A few jurors play Tic Tac Toe while Juror 8 is trying to open an important dialogue about shaky testimony.

What does “12 Angry Men” say about democracy and American civic duty

And one is getting over a flu, rendering him disinterested in discussion, especially in a sweltering hot room. This is not the design of democracy, and the film offers the point that if people treat the judicial process with such indifference and lack of seriousness, it becomes a pointless system.

In Twelve Angry Men, how does Reginald Rose demonstrate the value of the American jury system?

While such thinking is still a problem today, it was blatantly rampant in the court system at the time. The film is also a work of post-McCarthyism, and the jurors' instincts to unfairly convict recalls the very recent history of the McCarthy era. Many American artists and intellectuals were judged as Communists during the HUAC trials, often with little evidence and frequently by association.

  • It is also a film born in tandem with the origins of the civil rights movement, after the pandemonium of McCarthyism, in a time shadowed by the fear of nuclear war;
  • This is not the design of democracy, and the film offers the point that if people treat the judicial process with such indifference and lack of seriousness, it becomes a pointless system.

A verdict is never shown to be rendered on the accused: This is the foundation of the American justice system. Our collective sense of civic duty is the key to a functioning rule of law within the society.