College papers academic writing service


A history of aids and the penalty for consciously transmitting the virus

  • HIV can be passed from mother to child during pregnancy, birth and breastfeeding;
  • There was more discrimination and fewer legal protections than at present;
  • In Regina v Dica Mohammed [2004] the Court of Appeal held that a person was reckless if, knowing that they were HIV-positive, they transmitted HIV to a person who had not been told of the infection, and convicted him of a total sentence of 8 years' imprisonment;
  • There are categories of vulnerability to HIV infection in the present study;
  • Therefore, much emphasis was placed on gaining explicit and thoroughly informed consent to perform the test;
  • Regardless of the state, all criminal sentences involve the same potential types of penalties.

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Germany inconsistently tested plasma products between 1987 and 1993, as did Japan in 1985 and 1986.

  • In the case being ruled on, the man had used a condom during intercourse but not during oral sex;
  • Use of any provision herein should be contemplated only in conjunction with advice from legal counsel;
  • Closed questions were validated in previous surveys;
  • Territories, Federal government, and military in 2010;
  • Physicians should also follow any wishes expressed in a valid and applicable advance decision, if the patient has recorded one.

There were criminal investigations and prosecutions of those persons found to be responsible for these delays see Weinberg et al. At least 20 countries now have plans in place to compensate some classes of individuals, e.

Legal situation[ edit ] In many English-speaking countries and in most of the states who have signed the European Convention of Human Rights[2] knowingly infecting others with HIV can lead to criminal prosecution.

One such case is that of Thomas Guerraan American landscape architect, who became the first person in the state of California to be convicted for intentionally infecting another individual with HIV. In court, prosecutors presented 11,000 text messages and 36 audio clips to support their case against Guerra.

  • Gender representations are observed on the speech of the interviewees, as well as cultural values regarding love and fidelity, expressed, for example by the "myth of the romantic love" 3 as an essential attribute of happiness;
  • Though state laws differ, they typically include both HIV as well as other communicable or contagious sexually transmitted diseases;
  • A positive diagnosis can affect personal relationships, have financial implications or can lead to discrimination and isolation;
  • Rarely, children and young people may contract the virus through sexual abuse;
  • Unsourced material may be challenged and removed;
  • Theory, Practice and Policy" at Keele University deal with the question of criminalization.

Since then, Guerra has been accused of intentionally exposing dozens of other men to HIV. Under section 79 3 it is a defence, if the court is satisfied, that the defendant took reasonable precautions to prevent the transmission.

Services on Demand

If talking about the problems of practising safe sex does not help, the doctor may obtain a Public Health Order to manage the behaviour of the HIV positive person. In NSW the relevant offences are separated into those done intentionally Section 33 of the Crimes Act 1900[9] and those done recklessly Section 35. The definition of grievous bodily harm GBH [10] now[ when? Under section 33 a person who intends to inflect grievous bodily harm on another person can be imprisoned for up to 25 years while under section 35 a person who recklessly causes another person grievous bodily harm can be imprisoned for up to 10 years and 14 years if in company.

This can include causing someone to be infected with HIV. A person is generally deemed as reckless when they are aware that there is a risk that another person may be caused GBH as a result of their actions, but they proceed to act anyway. Mabior, 2012 SCC 47 reflects the Supreme Court of Canada's most recent decision outlining criminal liability for serostatus nondisclosure.

After being diagnosed with HIV in 2004, Clato Mabior underwent aggressive antiretroviral therapy and was adhering to treatment at the time of pursuing sexual relations with multiple partners between 2004-2006. Despite intermittent condom use, HIV was never transmitted to his partners.

Ultimately, the Court convicted Mabior with six counts of aggravated sexual assault. The Mabior ruling comes fourteen years after R.

Criminal transmission of HIV

The Supreme Court of Canada found that the trial judge had misdirected himself and ordered a new trial on two counts of aggravated assault but, in May 1999, the Attorney-General for British Columbia announced that a new persons trial would not take place. Thus, because the Canadian legislature has declined to criminalize the transmission of HIV, the judiciary must address the issues as and when they arise.

Subsequent legal precedent [12] has established that failure to disclose HIV-positive status, combined with failure to utilize protective measures condom useis sufficiently fraudulent behaviour to constitute turning "consensual" sex into aggravated sexual assault, since the other party has been denied the information necessary to give properly informed consent. The Court's vague justification for serostatus disclosure under circumstances that lead to "significant risk of bodily harm" remained a particularly contentious issue in the aftermath of Cuerrier.

Because Cuerrier did not expressly define "significant risk", lower courts inconsistently criminalized HIV-positive defendants based on varied interpretations of the clause. In large part, Mabior represents a response to Cuerrier and an attempt to sharpen the criteria. He asked whether there is a legal obligation to disclose HIV status. He held up the case of Johnson Azigawho was diagnosed in 1996 but then allegedly had unprotected sex with at least 13 women.

Aziga was charged with two counts of murder and 11 counts of aggravated sexual assault; the prosecution claims that he did not disclose his status.

On 4 April 2009, Aziga was found guilty of the two counts of first degree murder as well as the lesser counts. The current precedent in Canada stands as any person who has HIV, fails to disclose the fact to their sexual partner, and does not take some sort of protective measure such as condom useis guilty of aggravated sexual assault as per R.

Consent to HIV tests and treatment

Cuerrier and subsequent cases. Aziga was convicted of first degree murder since under Canadian law, any death as a result of aggravated sexual assault two of the women died as a result of the HIV infection received from intercourse with Aziga is automatically first degree murder as per section 231 of the Criminal Code of Canada. If the Crown can show that the accused knew that he was imposing this kind of risk of death on them, and was indifferent to the risk, then that would probably be sufficient to satisfy the element of intent for murder.

As a result, the death of Aziga's partners was automatically considered to be murder instead of the lesser charge of manslaughter. However, in Mabior the Supreme Court rejected the view that consent will always be vitiated by non-disclosure of HIV-positive status, substituting the rule that there will be no consent only if in addition to the non-disclosure there was a realistic possibility of transmission of HIV.

In January 1997, Finnish police published Thomas' picture in newspapers and stated that Thomas may have infected tens or even hundreds of Finnish women with HIV.

Seventeen women said they had been in unprotected sexual contact with Thomas. Lauri Lehtimaja, the Ombudsman of the Parliament, gave a warning to the court judge about his misuse of the law. The documents of the case were classified for 40 years.

He was first convicted in 2005 and sentenced to one year and nine months in prison for attempted aggravated assault. On 5 October 2007, police published the name and photo of Hakkarainen in newspapers in an effort to reach all women who had had sexual intercourse with him. On 22 April 2008, Rovaniemi court concluded that Hakkarainen knowingly infected five women with HIV, and in August 2008 he was found guilty of five counts of aggravated assault and 14 counts of attempted aggravated assault.

He was sentenced to ten years in prison. He was also ordered to pay 45,000—55,000 euros compensation to the five women that contracted the virus. She faced prison, but was instead given probation 2 years a history of aids and the penalty for consciously transmitting the virus community service. Women groups were outraged at the possibility of a woman being charged for negligently spreading HIV. She denied any intent to infect, apologising profusely and saying "When I was arrested I realised that the way that I had dealt with the illness had been wrong.

I made a big mistake. No way did I want my partner to be[come] infected. Benaissa has claimed she had been told by doctors that the risk of passing on the virus was "practically zero".

The HIV trial in Libyaalso called 'the Bulgarian nurses affair', concerns the trials, appeals and eventual release of six foreign medical workers charged with conspiring to deliberately infect over 400 children with HIV in 1998, causing an epidemic at El-Fatih Children's Hospital in BenghaziLibya. The torture process is described in details in the book Notes from Hell[26] co-written by Nikolay Yordanov and one of the nurses, Valya Chervianashka. As a result, three of the medics signed confessions.

They were first sentenced to death, had their case remanded by Libya's highest court, and were sentenced to death again, which was upheld by Libya's highest court in early July 2007. A Libyan government panel later commuted their sentences to life in prison. Multiple women came forward saying they had unprotected sex with Mwai who had not told them he had HIV. At least two of the women tested positive for HIV. Peter Mwai was charged under existing laws, for causing 'grievous body harm' and 'reckless endangerment'.

Transmitting an STD: Criminal Laws & Penalties

In the case being ruled on, the man had used a condom during intercourse but not during oral sex. His partner had not been infected. The same man was convicted of criminal nuisance earlier for having unprotected sex with another partner without revealing his HIV status. In Regina v Dica Mohammed [2004] the Court of Appeal held that a person was reckless if, knowing that they were HIV-positive, they transmitted HIV to a person who had not been told of the infection, and convicted him of a total sentence of 8 years' imprisonment.

They acknowledged that there could be a higher standard of disclosure expected of someone in a relationship, compared with the "known risks" involved in casual sex. Matthew Weait has critically discussed the case. The first, from Cardiff, was jailed for 2 years; [43] the second, Sarah Jane Porter, was convicted of grievous bodily harm through the reckless transmission of HIV, and was sentenced to 32 months in prison in June 2006.

The issues and problems surrounding phylogenetic analysis in criminal investigation are discussed in a 2007 report by aidsmap. Theory, Practice and Policy" at Keele University deal with the question of criminalization. Territories, Federal government, and military in 2010.

  1. He held up the case of Johnson Aziga , who was diagnosed in 1996 but then allegedly had unprotected sex with at least 13 women.
  2. Many, but not all, states have laws that criminalize the transmission of at least some types of STDs between people. After being diagnosed with HIV in 2004, Clato Mabior underwent aggressive antiretroviral therapy and was adhering to treatment at the time of pursuing sexual relations with multiple partners between 2004-2006.
  3. Granted by an adult or young person who has the mental capacity to make such a decision. Restitution payments can also be made a part of transmission of an STD sentence.
  4. After being diagnosed with HIV in 2004, Clato Mabior underwent aggressive antiretroviral therapy and was adhering to treatment at the time of pursuing sexual relations with multiple partners between 2004-2006. Aziga was convicted of first degree murder since under Canadian law, any death as a result of aggravated sexual assault two of the women died as a result of the HIV infection received from intercourse with Aziga is automatically first degree murder as per section 231 of the Criminal Code of Canada.

For example, on February 23, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces reversed the aggravated assault conviction of Technical Sergeant David Gutierrez upon determining, that the risk of HIV transmission through sexual intercourse was not "likely to produce death or grievous bodily harm" under the applicable statute.

Additional criticisms of criminalization point to the lack of empirical evidence supporting its ability to stop or slow infections, ongoing reluctance of legal entities to narrowly tailor prosecutions to behaviors that transmit the disease, excessive punishments and disproportionate impact on disenfranchised communities.

California lowers penalty for knowingly exposing partners to HIV