College papers academic writing service


Federal taxes should be reduced in the united states

Tobacco products are taxed in two ways: Currently, federal taxes on cigarettes, small cigars, and smokeless tobacco products are unit taxes; federal taxes on large cigars are ad valorem taxes. In 1993, all states and most localities used a unit tax for taxing cigarettes and ad valorem taxes for non-cigarette tobacco products.

Tax Treaty Tables

Increasingly, however, taxation of tobacco products is being recognized as an effective strategy to discourage tobacco use and enhance public health. The chapter concludes with a discussion of arguments for and against using tobacco taxes as a strategy to discourage adolescent tobacco use in the United States. Federal taxes on tobacco have been part of the federal tax system since the Civil War.

Between 1864 and 1983, the federal tax on cigarettes has fluctuated in response to the revenue requirements of the government, corresponding mainly to alternating periods of war and peace. The federal cigarette tax was not increased again until 1983, when it was doubled to 16 cents per pack.

In January 1992 the federal tax on cigarettes was increased from 16 to 20 cents per pack, with another 4 cents per pack added in January 1993. In 1985, the federal government levied a tax of 24 cents per pound on snuff, 8 cents per pound on chewing tobacco, and 45 cents per pound on pipe tobacco.

As of 1993, federal taxes on snuff, chewing tobacco, and pipe tobacco are 36, 12, and 67. In addition, 40 states impose taxes on tobacco products other than cigarettes. In 1921, Iowa became the first state to tax cigarettes; in 1969, North Carolina was the last state to enact a cigarette excise tax.

In all but 4 of these 43 states, the sales tax base includes the excise tax, adding between 6 cents and 14 cents to the price of a pack of cigarettes. With few exceptions, the imposition of, and increases in, state tobacco taxes are the result of the need to raise revenues. However, the level of tax imposed appears to be influenced by how dependent a state is on tobacco production. For example, in 1992, the average cigarette tax in non-tobacco-producing states was 19 cents higher than in large tobacco-producing states.

In addition to state excise taxes, over 440 local jurisdictions in 9 states also levy taxes on tobacco products. In 1993, 440 cities and counties imposed taxes on cigarettes, while 82 cities and counties levied taxes on non-cigarette tobacco products.

A 1977 report by the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations identified a variety of tax evasion strategies including casual smuggling that is, individuals buying cigarettes in neighboring states with lower taxespurchase of cigarettes through tax-free outlets such as military stores and American-Indian reservations, commercial smuggling for resale, and illegal diversion of cigarettes within the traditional distribution system by forging tax stamps and underreporting.

Access Denied

During the late 1960s and early 1970s, as the differential between state cigarette tax rates increased, organized smuggling and illegal diversion of cigarettes from the legal distribution system also increased. This law prohibits the transportation, receipt, shipment, possession, distribution, or purchase of more than 60,000 cigarettes not bearing the indicia of the state in which the cigarettes were found. A 1985 study by the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations concluded that the Cigarette Contraband Act had markedly reduced organized interstate smuggling of cigarettes.

This figure illustrates the growing discrepancy between taxes and pack price.

Growing up Tobacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youths.

Figure 6-1 also shows that the average state excise tax on cigarettes has increased by more 3 cents to 29 cents than the federal tax 8 cents to 24 cents since 1955.

The Tax Burden on Tobacco. Because excise taxes on cigarettes in the United States are unit rather than ad valorem taxes, inflation reduces the real value of the tax relative to the price.

Figure 6-2 shows trends in cigarette taxes and pack prices adjusted for inflation. Overall, taxes today have failed to keep pace with inflation and therefore are less, in real value, than they were in 1955.

  1. Behavioral Effects and Policy Implications.
  2. The income code numbers shown in this table are the same as the income codes on Form 1042-S, Foreign Person's U.
  3. American Medical Association, 1993. In Finland, Pekurinen found that the most important factor influencing demand for pipe tobacco was the price of cigarettes.
  4. Figure 6-2 shows trends in cigarette taxes and pack prices adjusted for inflation.

In order to appreciate economic incentives or disincentives to use tobacco products, one must consider not only price changes but also price affordability. Over the past half century, tobacco has become increasingly more affordable to consumers in the United States because of rising income. Until the 1980s, the affordability of cigarettes increased because of the declining real price of cigarettes.

Between 1985 and 1990, tobacco manufacturers increased cigarette prices in excess of the rate of inflation and consumer income. Thus, there was a sharp decline in the affordability of cigarettes, although prices remained more affordable than in 1955. The lower affordability of cigarettes in the 1980s corresponds with a decline in consumption.

As illustrated in table 6-2the lower cigarette affordability since 1985 had little to do with government taxes; total taxes on a pack of cigarettes were no less affordable in 1990 than in 1980.

In 1993, cigarette manufacturers, led by Philip Morris, Inc. Changes in the affordability of a pack of cigarettes in the United States between 1955 and 1990, using 1955 as the base year.

Do U.S. High Corporate Tax Rates Hurt Americans?

However, when these figures are adjusted for inflation they show a decline: The decline in revenues from tobacco taxes partly reflects a steady drop in per capita cigarette consumption since the mid-1970s.

However, the primary reason for the declining revenues is the failure of the federal government to adjust cigarette tax rates to keep pace with inflation. For example, figure 6-3 shows that the decline in federal tobacco tax revenues occurred despite the fact that total cigarette sales were nearly identical in 1993 and 1963. As a result of inflation, declining consumption, and identification of other revenue sources, tobacco taxes at both the federal and state levels now account for a significantly smaller share of total revenues compared to 40 years ago.

In the United States, the average combined federal and state tax on cigarettes in 1993 was 53 cents per pack. The combination of lower cigarette taxes and a higher standard of living that is, more money to spend on goods makes cigarettes much more affordable for Americans than for persons in nearly all other industrialized countries.

Average retail selling price, total taxes, and percentage tax of average retail price for a pack of 20 cigarettes in 24 selected countries as of December 1, 1993. Because of the addictive qualities of tobacco, some federal taxes should be reduced in the united states have speculated that consumption of cigarettes will be insensitive to price changes at least in the short run. Studies estimate that approximately two-thirds of the decreased consumption is the result of people choosing not to smoke at all.

Help Menu Mobile

An analysis of Finland's cigarette consumption between 1960 and 1987 found that the demand for cigarettes was twice as sensitive to falling prices as to rising prices.

Increases in excise taxes are usually passed on to consumers. In addition to taxes, the retail price of tobacco products is determined by the manufacturer's costs and profits and wholesale and retail markups.

For example, Harris argues that most of the decline in U. In Finland, Pekurinen found that the most important factor influencing demand for pipe tobacco was the price of cigarettes. In other words, at least for male adolescents, there may be a significant degree of substitutability between cigarettes and smokeless tobacco; however, no studies have actually tested this hypothesis.

The Canadian Experience The Canadian experience with raising tobacco taxes during the past decade provides a useful model for predicting the impact of tobacco tax increases in the United States.

  • In order to appreciate economic incentives or disincentives to use tobacco products, one must consider not only price changes but also price affordability;
  • The federal cigarette tax was not increased again until 1983, when it was doubled to 16 cents per pack;
  • It is important that you read both the treaty and the protocol s that would apply to the tax year in which the payment is made.

In the early 1980s, federal taxes on tobacco products in Canada were modest, not unlike the current tax rate in the United States. Since 1985, there have been three significant increases in the federal cigarette tax in Canada, raising the tax from 32 cents U. Declines in cigarette smoking prevalence have mirrored trends in per capita sales.

The findings from this study are of interest for several reasons. First, the price elasticity of demand for tax-paid cigarettes was significantly higher than found in most other studies.

The report speculates that Canadian smokers may have initially reacted to price increases either by reducing the amount smoked or by quitting. However, over time, the addictive nature of tobacco leads some of these individuals to return to their past consumption levels. Third, the study found a significant degree of substitutability between cigarettes and fine-cut tobacco.

Since 1980, both price and tax increases have widened the price differential between cigarettes and fine-cut tobacco. As a result, some smokers have switched from cigarettes to cheaper, fine-cut roll-your-own tobacco products. Fourth, exports and smuggling of cigarettes increased as a result of tax hikes. Between 1985 and 1991 there was a large increase in the number of seizures of illicitly imported tobacco products, indicating that smuggling had become a problem in Canada.

Finally, the study found that tobacco taxes were particularly important in discouraging younger Canadians from smoking. A comparison of the smoking habits of teenagers and adults showed that younger Canadians were more sensitive to price changes than adults. Overall, the study concluded that "On balance, federal tax increases since 1985 have resulted in a net decline in overall tobacco consumption in Canada. First, as noted in chapter 1the vast majority of adult smokers began their smoking careers before they turned 21; therefore, there is a good chance that persons who have not started smoking by age 20 will never smoke.

Second, preventing people from starting to smoke is likely to be the most effective approach in the long-term for reducing the health problems associated with tobacco use.

Finally, there is good reason to expect that adolescents are more price sensitive than adults because they are less addicted to federal taxes should be reduced in the united states that is, they smoke fewer cigarettes per day and have less disposable income that is, cigarettes are less affordable for them. Sure, they'll buy them every once in a while, and they start thinking: No money to go to the movies, no money for gas or whatever. The largest of these studies utilized data from Cycle III of the Health Examination Survey conducted between 1966 and 1970 to study the effects of cigarette prices, advertising restrictions, and sociodemographic factors on the cigarette smoking behavior of 5,308 teenagers between federal taxes should be reduced in the united states ages of 12 and 17.

  1. The largest of these studies utilized data from Cycle III of the Health Examination Survey conducted between 1966 and 1970 to study the effects of cigarette prices, advertising restrictions, and sociodemographic factors on the cigarette smoking behavior of 5,308 teenagers between the ages of 12 and 17. Alternative minimum tax AMT AMT previously was imposed on corporations other than S corporations see below and small C corporations generally those with three-year average annual gross receipts not exceeding 7.
  2. The lower affordability of cigarettes in the 1980s corresponds with a decline in consumption. Figure 6-4 illustrates the price sensitivity of Canadian teenagers by juxtaposing teenage smoking trends between 1979 and 1991 with changes in the average retail price for 20 cigarettes.
  3. Figure 6-2 shows trends in cigarette taxes and pack prices adjusted for inflation.

The federal taxes should be reduced in the united states found that cigarette prices had a significant effect on the smoking behavior of teenagers. The summary price elasticity of demand of -0. However, a more recent study, utilizing data collected in the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1976-1980failed to find a statistically significant effect of cigarette prices on cigarette smoking by youths aged 12 through 17.

The index measuring state antismoking regulations was found to have a significant effect on cigarette consumption by teenagers, leading the authors to conclude that restrictions on indoor smoking may have a greater impact on preventing youths from initiating smoking than do increases in cigarette prices. However, critics of this study point out that antismoking regulations are not likely to have any direct impact on youths because youths spend most of their time in school; instead, the regulation may merely reflect the level of antismoking sentiment in a region.

Marlboro, Newport, or Camel. The Canadian experience in raising tobacco taxes during the 1980s provides useful data for comparing the price sensitivity of teenagers and adults. An analysis comparing the cigarette smoking prevalence and average daily consumption of Canadian teenagers ages 15-19 and the total population over age 15 between 1980 and 1989 found that the decline in smoking prevalence among teenagers was steeper than for the total population. Figure 6-4 illustrates the price sensitivity of Canadian teenagers by juxtaposing teenage smoking trends between 1979 and 1991 with changes in the average retail price for 20 cigarettes.

The Canadian Tobacco Tax Experience: In addition to changes in the proportion of teenagers smoking, there has been a dramatic change in the pattern of smoking by Canadian teens. Conversely, there has been an increase in the percentage of young Canadians who report smoking occasionally. However, Sweanor and colleagues caution that reductions in tobacco prices or increases in personal income may result in many occasional smokers becoming regular smokers in the future, and argue that ".

U.S. Tax Withholding on Payments to Foreign Persons

Not surprisingly, a 10-cent increase in the price of a pack of cigarettes was perceived not to be a large deterrent to smoking, especially among current daily smokers. The findings from this study suggest that teenagers themselves perceive sizable price increases on tobacco products to be an important deterrent to tobacco use.

This perception was also confirmed in focus groups conducted under the Committee's auspices. The following statement by one teen represents the opinion expressed by many of the teens: A 50-cent increase wouldn't make any difference. Despite the fact that only a few studies have actually examined the relationship between cigarette prices and smoking by youths, most health economists conclude that the price responsiveness of adolescents is likely to be at least as high as for adults, if not higher.

Because tobacco taxes are relatively low, higher taxes would generate large increases in revenue even while smoking rates decline. Some taxes can have undesirable effects; for example, income taxes might discourage working, and investment taxes might discourage savings.

  • If corporate taxes were not such a burden, companies could instead spend lobbying dollars on developing new products and services and increasing sales;
  • Declines in cigarette smoking prevalence have mirrored trends in per capita sales;
  • The findings from this study are of interest for several reasons;
  • Foreign procedures for claiming reduced withholding are determined under the laws and practices of the treaty partner;
  • However, critics of this study point out that antismoking regulations are not likely to have any direct impact on youths because youths spend most of their time in school; instead, the regulation may merely reflect the level of antismoking sentiment in a region.

However, high taxes on tobacco products are desirable because they would discourage use of the nation's leading cause of preventable death. A 1990 report by the Congressional Budget Office supports the widely held belief that tobacco taxes are regressive.